RICHARD HORTON Editor, Sabine Kleinert (Munich) deputy editor, the editorial managers Lucy Banham and Hannah Jones, Seil Collins and Johanna Harvey Head of Media & Communications (USA) know about irregularities at the Lancet but despite my requests have not given me Elsevier's email address
MONDAY 8 APRIL
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY EMAILED ME TODAY SAYING THAT SALLY MARSHALL HAD RETIRED WHICH IS RIDICULOUS SINCE SHE IS ON THEIR WEBSITE. I HAD MENTIONED IN MY LETTER TO HER WHICH IS REQUIRED WHEN ONE SENDS A PAPER TO THE OMBUDSMAN TO BE CONSIDERED FOR PUBLICATION, THAT I SUSPECTED THAT MY DIABETES PAPER WOULD ALSO END UP COMING HER WAY.
SO I AM SURE THAT AS SHE CAN ACCESS ALL MY SUBMISSIONS SHE WENT AND READ IT AND AS SHE IS A PROFESSOR OF DIABETES IN THE 'TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE' . ACCORDING TO THE UNIVERSITY WEBSITE WHICH GIVES HER TELEPHONE NUMBER AS +44 (0)191 208 7880 SHE IS ON THE EDITORIAL BOARD OF THE DIABETES JOURNAL DIABETOLOGIA, HAS AN INDEPENDENT CHAIR, TRIAL STEERING COMMITTEE, ADOLESCENT TYPE 1 DIABETES CARDIO-RENAL INTERVENTION TRAIL (www.addit-trial.org) AND ALSO HAS AN INDEPENDENT CHAIR, TRIAL STEERING COMMITTEE, MELD-ATG (www.innodia.eu)
SINCE SHE IS INVOLVED IN TWO TRIALS FOR WHICH SHE IS VERY LIKELY TO BE PAID, SHE PROBABLY DOESN'T WANT TO ACCEPT MY ASTHMA PAPER BECAUSE MY NEXT SUBMISSION TO HER AS THE LANCET OMBUDSMAN WOULD HAVE BEEN MY DIABETES PAPER, WHICH EXPLAINS THE MECHANISM OF HOW DIABETES IS CAUSED BY VARIOUS DRUGS.
THIS SHOULD MAKE IT CLEAR TO THE PUBLIC THAT OMBUDSMEN CAN BE CORRUPT AS CAN MEDICAL JOURNALS WHICH THESE DAYS ARE FOCUSED ON PUBLISHING CLINICAL TRIALS FUNDED BY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AS THEIR AGENDA IS TO HAVE A PILL FOR EVERY ILL.
FRIDAY 5 APRIL 2024
THE LANCET STILL HASN'T ACCEPTED OR REJECTED MY FOUR
PAPERS ABOUT ASTHMA & DIABETES THAT ARE ALSO ON PODD.WORLD.
I HAVE SCREENSHOTS SHOWING THAT NOTHING HAS CHANGED IN MY ACCOUNT SHOWING MY SUBMISSIONS SINCE 24 FEBRUARY 2024.
AFTER BEING REJECTEDMY ASTHMA PAPER WAS SENT TO THE OMBUDSMAN IN SEPTEMBER 2023 AND I STILL HAVEN'T BEEN GIVEN A DECISION BY THE OMBUDSMAN SALLY MARSHALL.
MY OTHER PAPERS WERE SENT IN FOR AN APPEAL AS SOON AS THEY WERE REJECTED AND I STILL HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY DECISIONS.
SATURDAY 2 MARCH 2024
ALL OF MY FOUR PAPERS ABOUT ASTHMA, DIABETES AND THE BNF THAT I SUBMITTED TO THE LANCET AND WERE REJECTED BACK IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 2023, HAVE STILL NOT BEEN GIVEN A FINAL DECISION.
AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE TABLE OF MY LANCET ACCOUNT FURTHER DOWN, MY ASTHMA PAPER HAS BEEN REJECTED TWICE, SO I SENT IT TO THE OMBUDSMAN PROFESSOR SALLY MARSHALL AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER 2023. I STILL HAVEN'T BEEN GIVEN A DECISION AFTER FIVE THAT'S RIGHT, FIVE MONTHS. I WONDER WHY IT'S TAKING HER SO LONG TO REACH A DECISION. IS IT BECAUSE SHE IS WORRIED ABOUT LOOKING LIKE AN IDIOT BECAUSE HER RESEARCH INTERESTS ARE "DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY - GENETICS, CELLULAR BIOLOGY, NATURAL HISTORY AND MANAGEMENT" AND I TOLD HER THAT I HAVE A DIABETES PAPER SO SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO VIEW IT IN MY ACCOUNT, AND IT EXPLAINS WHY DIABETES CAN BE CAUSED BY PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. IT CAN ALSO BE CAUSED BY CHEMICALS THAT HAVE THE RIGHT CHEMICAL STRUCTURE. MY PAPER WOULD RESULT IN LESS CHARITY, GOVERNMENT AND NHS MONEY GOING TO DIABETES RESEARCH.
MY DIABETES PAPER WAS REJECTED BY DR DAN ERKES IN THE USA AND HE WROTE TO ME DIRECTLY, INSTEAD OF THE DEPUTY EDITOR SABINE KLEINERT WHICH IS ODD. IT WAS NEVER PUT IN MY LANCET ACCOUNT SO I COULDN'T SEND IT TO THE OMBUDSMAN. I WROTE TO HER AND THE EDITOR RICHARD HORTON BUT NEVER RECEIVED A REPLY.
MY OTHER TWO PAPERS WERE ALSO SENT IN FOR AN APPEAL BUT I HAVE NEVER HAD AN ANSWER. I WORKED OUT THAT RICHARD HORTON WHO HAD BEEN CODING ME SINCE OCTOBER HAD AN AGENDA WHICH I HAVE EXPLAINED BELOW. CONSEQUENTLY I PUBLISHED MY PAPERS ON MY WEBSITE IN EARLY TO MID-DECEMBER 2023, CLEARED MY DETAILS FROM MY LANCET ACCOUNT AND WROTE TO RICHARD TELLING HIM THAT THE LANCET COULD NOT PUBLISH MY PAPERS AS I HAD PUBLISHED THEM AND CLOSED MY ACCOUNT.
I WROTE TO HIM AGAIN A FEW DAYS AGO AND ALSO TO THE EDITORIAL TEAM, RICHARD AND HEAD OF COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LANCET IN LONDON, STATING THAT THE LANCET WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PUBLISH MY PAPERS.
SOMEONE HAD SET UP A NEW ACCOUNT NAME FOR ME AND USED 'LISA LIM' FOR MY ACCOUNT WHICH IS A NAME I HAVE NEVER USED AS IT IS NOT MY NAME. THE SCREENSHOT OF MY ACCOUNT ON 24 FEBRUARY 2024 SHOWING MY SUBMISSIONS SHOWS THAT THEY ALSO FILLED IN MY DETAILS THAT I HAD REMOVED.
SO I DECIDED TO WRITE TO RICHARD AND OTHERS IN THE LANCET AGAIN TO TELL THEM THAT THE LANCET IS NOT ALLOWED TO PUBLISH MY PAPERS. I HAVE GIVEN PERMISSION TO THE 'TELEGRAPH' AND 'TIMES' AND 'SUNDAY TIMES' TO PUBLISH MY PAPERS IN FULL DUE TO IRREGULARITIES IN THE LANCET.
THE LANCET HAS 24 DIFFERENT MEDICAL JOURNALS COVERING DIFFERENT AREAS OF MEDICINE, HOWEVER MOST DON'T SEEM TO BE VERY POPULAR. THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE IN LONDON WHICH KEEPS MOST JOURNALS OR HAS ONLINE COPIES OF THEM ONLY STOCKS A FEW OF THEM. PUBLISHERS HAVE CREATED NEW SPECIALIST JOURNALS COVERING CANCER, RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, BLOOD AND DIABETES FOR EXAMPLE TO MAKE MONEY. THIS IS PROBABLY WHY RICHARD HORTON HAS SAID WORDS TO THE EFFECT THAT ABOUT HALF OF MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT WORTH THE PAPER THEY'RE WRITTEN ON, WHICH IS ONE REASON WHY I CREATED A BULLSHIT PAGE.
SATURDAY 3 FEBRUARY 2024
RICHARD HORTON WHO I CALLED RICKY AS IT'S SHORTER TO TYPE, HAS FOR OVER 4 MONTHS REFUSED TO PAY ME A REDUCED AMOUNT OF £2K FOR FLIGHTS AND ACCOMMODATION THAT I LOST OUT ON AS HE ASKED ME TO STAY IN THE UK RATHER THAN GO OVERSEAS TO TALK. IT TRANSPIRES THAT HE STILL HAS AN AGENDA WANTING TO PUBLISH MY FOUR PAPERS THAT YOU CAN READ ON MY 'ASTHMA & DIABETES' PAGE. I NOW BELIEVE THAT HE HAS BEEN DELAYING BECAUSE HE WANTED THEIR PUBLICATION TO FIT IN WITH HIS LEASE.
AS HE CODED THAT HE HAD NO HOME (I HAVE ALL THE SCREENSHOTS SHOWING THIS) I HAD SAID THAT HE COULD HAVE THE EMPTY ROOM IN MY COUNCIL HOUSE IN SCOTLAND AND THAT HE COULD USE ANY ONE OF THE FOUR TABLES/DESKS THAT I USE. I LIKE TO WORK IN DIFFERENT ROOMS DEPENDING ON THE SUNSHINE AND SEASON TO USE LESS HEATING IN WINTER.
I TOLD HIM THAT I DON'T HAVE A MORTGAGE AND THERE ARE ROOMS THAT LOOK OUT ON TO THE HILLS. I TOLD HIM THAT I HAD GIVEN FREE ACCOMMODATION TO A COUPLE OF OTHER PEOPLE BEFORE, ONE A HIGHLY GIFTED ARTIST DAVID K REES AS I WAS GOING TO BE OVERSEAS.
I FELT SORRY FOR RICHARD AS HE HAD BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH STAGE 4 MELANOMA AND I THOUGHT THAT I MIGHT BE ABLE TO HELP HIM AND PERHAPS RECORD USEFUL INFORMATION ABOUT HIS HEALTH AS I HAD ADVISED HIM TO TAKE A STACK OF SUPPLEMENTS.
HE CODED THAT HE WANTED TO SHIP SOME BOXES UP TO SCOTLAND, SO I HELPED HIM TO FIND A SUITABLE COURIER COMPANY. THIS WAS BEFORE CHRISTMAS WHEN I HAD ALREADY PUBLISHED MY PAPERS ONLINE, SO I HAD MADE IT QUITE CLEAR THAT I HAD NO INTEREST IN HIM OR BEING PUBLISHED BY THE LANCET. I HAVE NEVER MET A MAN WHO IS BOTH INTERESTING AND CONSIDERATE.
THURSDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2024
RICHARD HORTON STILL HASN'T PAID ME £2K FOR FLIGHTS AND ACCOMMODATION TO AUSTRALIA AND ELSEWHERE THAT I LOST OUT ON AS HE ASKED ME TO STAY. HE CODED THAT HE WAS DYING AND WHEN ASKED HOW LONG HE HAD HE CODED SIX MONTHS.
SINCE HE WAS SO ILL I ASSUMED THAT HE WANTED ME TO STAY TO TRY TO HELP HIM AS I HAVE HELPED OTHERS.
HOWEVER IT TRANSPIRES THAT HE HAS ALWAYS HAD AN AGENDA. HE WANTED TO PUBLISH MY PAPERS THAT WOULD BE READ AROUND THE WORLD BUT HE WANTED TO PUBLISH THEM TO FIT IN WITH HIS PERSONAL AGENDA. I HAVE BEEN TELLING HIM THAT PEOPLE ARE BEING MAIMED AND DYING TO NO AVAIL. I HAVE NOW COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT HE WANTED TO HOLD ON UNTIL HE WAS FREE TO ACCOMPANY ME ON POSSIBLE TRIPS TO EUROPE AND OVERSEAS TO TALK TO OTHER NATIONS ABOUT THE FACT THAT ANTIBIOTICS CAN CAUSE ASTHMA AND DIABETES.
SUNDAY 28 JANUARY 2024
THE LANCET HAS NOT GIVEN ME AN ANSWER AS TO WHETHER MY REJECTED PAPERS, ONE SENT TO THE OMBUDSMAN PROFESSOR SALLY MARSHALL OR THOSE SENT IN FOR AN APPEAL, HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED OR REJECTED.
SOME PAPERS WERE RESUBMITTED IN APPEALS FOUR MONTHS AGO SO IT IS MOST IRREGULAR THAT I HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN A DECISION. IT SUGGESTS THAT THEY ARE BEING HELD IN LIMBO TO MEET SOMEBODY'S AGENDA.
I WAS ASKED TO GIVE MY ASTHMA PAPER A NEW TITLE WHEN IT WAS REJECTED. HAVING DONE SO, IT WAS REJECTED AGAIN, SO I SENT IT TO THE OMBUDSMAN PROFESSOR SALLY MARSHALL. SHE HAS NEITHER ACCEPTED OR REJECTED IT AFTER NEARLY 4 MONTHS, IF SHE HAS SENT IT TO THE EDITOR RICHARD HORTON WITH HER DECISION, I WONDER WHY I HAVEN'T BEEN INFORMED WHETHER IT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED OR REJECTED. THIS IS JUST ONE IRREGULARITY IN THE LANCET'S BEHAVIOUR.
THE EDITOR PROFESSOR RICHARD HORTON HAD ASKED ME TO STAY IN THE UK WHEN HE KNEW THAT I WAS LEAVING IN OCTOBER FOR AUSTRALIA, TO MEET WITH THE PREMIER OF WA ROGER COOK AND HEALTH MINISTER OF WA AMBER-JADE SANDERSON. THE PLANS WERE FOR ME TO TALK IN AUSTRALIA TO TELL THE WORLD THAT ASTHMA AND DIABETES ARE PREVENTABLE DISEASES.
I ASSUMED THAT AS RICHARD HAD COMMUNICATED THAT HE HAD 6 MONTHS TO LIVE, AS HE WAS REPORTED TO BE SUFFERING FROM STAGE FOUR MELANOMA AND I HAD GIVEN HIM VALUABLE ADVICE SOME OF WHICH I SOURCED FROM THE INTERNET, HE WANTED ME TO STAY SO THAT I COULD GIVE HIM ADVICE IN PERSON. I HAVE GIVEN EXTREMELY USEFUL HEALTH ADVICE TO DOCTORS AND POLITICIANS. ONE MALAYSIAN DOCTOR IN SYDNEY, WHO TOOK MY ADVICE WHICH WAS ADVISING HER TO TAKE OVER THE COUNTER DRUGS FOR PARASITES AFTER SHE LEARNT THAT I HAD WRITTEN A BOOK, RANG ME UP TO SAY THAT SHE HAD 'SHIT DEAD RATS' AND HAD GOT RID OF PARASITES.
AS RICHARD WAS NOT EVEN OF RETIREMENT AGE AND STAGE FOUR MELANOMA HAS A MUCH POORER PROGNOSIS THAN MELANOMA DIAGNOSED IN EARLIER STAGES AND RICHARD HAD WRITTEN ARTICLES DECLARING THAT A LOT OF MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS AREN'T WORTH THE PAPER THEY'RE WRITTEN ON, I DECIDED TO STAY TO SEE IF I COULD HELP HIM, AS I FELT SORRY FOR HIM AND I DIDN'T HAVE A FIRM DATE FOR SPEAKING IN AUSTRALIA.
I EMAILED HIM THE MELANOMA DATA SHOWN BELOW THAT REVEALS THAT MEN WERE FOUND TO BE MORE LIKELY THAN WOMEN TO DIE (PERHAPS BECAUSE THEY DRINK MORE ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOL HAS BEEN SHOWN TO SUPPRESS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM). I ALSO TOLD HIM THAT DIFFERENT RACES HAD DIFFERENT SURVIVAL RATES POSSIBLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE DIFFERENT DIETS, ASIANS EATING MORE VEGETABLES AND LESS SATURATED FATS. I TOLD HIM WHICH VITAMINS THOSE WHO ARE DIAGNOSED WITH MELANOMA TEND TO BE LOWER IN AND WHICH MIGHT HELP PREVENT A RECURRENCE.
I ALSO SENT HIM TWO MONTHS OF A MIX OF MANY VITAMINS AND MINERALS PACKAGED FOR EACH DAY SO THAT HE COULD SEE IF IT WAS A REGIME THAT HE WANTED TO TRY, AS NOT EVERYBODY LIKES TO TAKE TABLETS. THE PICTURE BELOW SHOWS MOST OF THE TABLETS THAT I SENT HIM. APART FROM FEELING SORRY FOR HIM, AS I KNOW HOW SOME PEOPLE FEEL WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH A DISEASE THAT IS TERMINAL, I DID HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE.
I THOUGHT THAT THE WORLD SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST ONE MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITOR WHO WAS PREPARED TO PUBLISH AN ADMISSION THAT SOMETHING LIKE 50% OF MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS ARE FULL OF NONSENSE. REVIEWERS OF PAPERS SUBMITTED MAY NOT BE WORKING IN THE SAME FIELD AND THEREFORE AREN'T FAMILIAR WITH THE DISEASE, BUT THEY KNOW THAT THE JOURNAL EXISTS AS A RESULT OF SUBMISSIONS BEING PAID FOR SO THEY MIGHT WANT TO ACCEPT THEM. MY SUBMISSION TO THE LANCET WAS A VIEWPOINT AND WAS FREE TO SUBMIT.
ONE MEMBER OF THE LANCET EDITORIAL TEAM ADDRESSED ME AS DR 'X' - NOT SURE WHETHER THEY WANT ME TO 'X' DOCTORS OR THEY WANTED TO 'X' ME.
ANOTHER PUT MY CHINESE NAMES IN WHEN I HADN'T USED THEM FOR MY SUBMISSION - DON'T LIKE THEM AND HAVE NEVER USED THEM. PERHAPS THERE ARE SOME RACIST STAFF IN THE LANCET, ANOTHER IRREGULARITY.
MY PAPER 'IS DIABETES AN IATROGENIC DISEASE' WAS REJECTED SO I SENT IT IN FOR AN 'APPEAL'. IT WAS SEEN BY DR DAN ERKES A SENIOR EDITOR WHO REVIEWS PAPERS SENT TO HIM IN THE USA BY THE LANCET. HE WROTE TO ME SAYING THAT IT HAD BEEN REJECTED WHEREAS THE DEPUTY EDITOR SABINE KLEINERT HAD REJECTED MY FIRST PAPER.
AS IT HAD BEEN REJECTED, I WANTED TO SEND IT TO THE OMBUDSMAN SALLY MARSHALL JUST AS I HAD DONE WITH MY ASTHMA PAPER. HOWEVER, DESPITE ASKING DAN AND SABINE KLEINERT TO POST THE REJECTION IN MY LANCET ACCOUNT, SO THAT I COULD SEND IT TO THE OMBUDSMAN, THEY NEVER DID SO.
IT TOOK THE LANCET A MONTH TO DECIDE TO REJECT MY PAPER "QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DOSE OF AMOXICILLIN 1981-2023". I SENT IT FOR AN APPEAL AND TO THIS DAY HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD WHETHER IT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED OR REJECTED.
THAT'S AFTER MORE THAN 3 MONTHS WHICH IS MOST IRREGULAR, SO SOMEONE MUST BE KEEPING THEM IN LIMBO, WAITING TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO PUBLISH THEM.
MY PAPER "ARE ASTHMA AND DIABETES IATROGENIC DISEASES?" WAS REJECTED OVER THREE AND A HALF MONTHS AGO AND I HAVE NOT BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE RESULT OF MY APPEAL.
IT COSTS AROUND £5,000 TO HAVE A PAPER PUBLISHED IN THE LANCET BUT MY SUBMISSIONS WERE 'VIEWPOINTS' SO THEY DIDN'T ATTRACT AN ARTICLE PROCESSING FEE. I HIGHLY COMMEND THE LANCET FOR HAVING THIS OPTION AS WITHOUT IT I WOULD PROBABLY NEVER HAVE WRITTEN MY PAPERS THAT HAVE BEEN CONVINCING PEOPLE IN IMPORTANT POSITIONS THAT ASTHMA AND DIABETES CAN BE CAUSED BY ANTIBIOTICS AND THAT THE DOSE OF AMOXICILLIN IN THE UK IS WAY TOO HIGH. I WOULD NOT HAVE WRITTEN THEM AS IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME AND I HAD TO OBTAIN PAPERS RELATING TO ASTHMA AND DIABETES AND BUY MANY COPIES OF THE BNF AND PAY FOR MEDICAL LITERATURE SEARCHES AT THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE IN LONDON.
I ALSO TRAVELLED DOWN TO LONDON TO EXAMINE SOME VERY OLD PAPERS ABOUT ASTHMA, AND I HAD ALREADY PUBLISHED TWO EDITIONS OF MY BOOK. MY BOOKS TOOK YEARS OF RESEARCHING, WRITING AND FORMATTING AS THERE WERE LOTS OF TABLES IN LANDSCAPE STYLE WITH A LOT OF INFORMATION AND CHEMICAL STRUCTURES. AS SOFTWARE WAS NOT AS ADVANCED IN 1994 AND 2006 IT WAS DIFFICULT TO GET THEM LOOKING RIGHT. I HAD ALSO PAID FOR IMAGES TO BE INCLUDED IN MY 2006 EDITION OF WHICH I ONLY SOLD ABOUT 5 COPIES AND HAD TO HAVE THEM CLUTTERING UP MY HOME FOR 16 YEARS. I WANTED TO HAVE AN NEWER VERSION WHICH IS IDENTICAL TO THE FIRST APART FROM THE CHAPTER WITH COLOURED IMAGES, A BETTER COVER AND MEDIA ARTICLES IN THE FRONT PAGE IN THE HOPE THAT IT WOULD BE MORE ATTRACTIVE TO THE MEDIA. HOWEVER AFTER TAKING A YEAR TO WORK ON IT AND FIND A PRINTER OVERSEAS I RAN OUT OF MONEY AND HAD TO GET A JOB.
BACK IN AUSTRALIA IN 1994, I USED THE BOXES OF MY BOOKS AS A BED BASE FOR A FOAM MATTRESS CUT FROM A PIECE OF FOAM AS IT WAS THE CHEAPEST BED THAT I COULD AFFORD. MOST OF THESE BOOKS ENDED UP IN A SKIP AS I HAD TO GET A JOB.
SINCE DOCTORS WANT TO BE PUBLISHED TO GET PROMOTED AND PROFESSORS WANT TO PUBLISH TO BECOME WELL KNOWN, THERE ARE A LOT OF MEDICAL JOURNALS AND RICHARD HAS SAID THAT..."MUCH OF THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, PERHAPS HALF, MAY SIMPLY BE UNTRUE".
MEDICAL JOURNALS THESE DAYS OFTEN PUBLISH THE RESULTS OF CLINICAL TRIALS TO PROMOTE A NEW DRUG. THE MEDIA NOT BEING SCIENTISTS MIGHT THEREFORE UNWITTINGLY PROMOTE THE RESULTS OF A TRIAL, WHICH DRUG COMPANIES HAVE DESIGNED TO SHOW MOSTLY THE BENEFICIAL EFFECTS SO THAT THE DRUG IS APPROVED FOR SALE.
LAST YEAR I SAW A DRUG COMPANY ADVERTISING FOR PEOPLE TO TAKE PART IN A CLINICAL TRIAL FOR WHICH PARTICIPANTS WOULD BE PAID £4,000. PEOPLE RECRUITED ARE USUALLY REQUIRED TO BE DISEASE AND DRUG FREE, UNLESS THEY ARE TO BE GIVEN A DRUG TO DETERMINE IF IT CAN HELP THEIR DISEASE, AND THEY ARE OFTEN YOUNG. THIS MEANS THAT THERE IS A BIAS IN THE STUDY, BECAUSE IF THEY ARE YOUNG, THEY MIGHT NOT HAVE TAKEN AS MANY DRUGS AS THOSE WHO ARE GOING TO BE PRESCRIBED THE DRUG BEING TESTED.
OLDER PEOPLE WHO HAVE TAKEN MORE DRUGS MIGHT BE MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO SIDE-EFFECTS OF THE DRUG BEING TESTED AS THEIR ORGANS MIGHT ALREADY HAVE BEEN DAMAGED. SO ANY SIDE-EFFECTS OF A DRUG BEING TESTED, MIGHT NOT BECOME APPARENT IN YOUNGER PARTICIPANTS AS THE VOLUNTEERS HAVEN'T HAD AS MUCH DRUG EXPOSURE.
ANOTHER MAJOR FLAW IN CLINICAL TRIALS IS THAT VOLUNTEERS ARE PAID, USUALLY AS THE TRIAL PROGRESSES AFTER THEY ATTEND TO HAVE BLOOD TAKEN OR TESTS RUN. VOLUNTEERS MAY BE UNEMPLOYED OR IN NEED OF MONEY, SO THEY ARE NOT LIKELY TO REPORT ANY SIDE-EFFECTS AS THEY COULD WELL BE EXCLUDED FROM THE TRIAL AND NO LONGER PAID.
THE DRUG COMPANY WOULD PROBABLY SAY THAT THEY DON'T WANT THE PERSON TO SUFFER ANY MORE SIDE-EFFECTS. HOWEVER, THIS MEANS THAT THE DRUG COMPANY IS ABLE TO MANIPULATE RESULTS BY EXCLUDING PEOPLE WHO HAVE SUFFERED SIDE-EFFECTS SO THAT THEIR SIDE-EFFECTS ARE NOT REPORTED.
TO THE OMBUDSMAN PROFESSOR SALLY MARSHALL IN SEPTEMBER 2023 OVER 5 MONTHS AGO.
YOU CAN SEE THAT SOMEONE HAS CHANGED MY ACCOUNT TO JUST lisalim INSTEAD OF ANNALISA (LISA) LANDYMORE-LIM. I HAVE ALSO BEEN GIVEN A DIFFERENT USERNAME.
IF YOU COMPARE THIS SCREENSHOT WITH THE ONE ABOVE YOU WILL SEE THAT THE SHADING IS NOW GREY INSTEAD OF A VERY PALE BLUE AND MY LAST SUBMISSION
"ARE ASTHMA AND DIABETES IATROGENIC DISEASES?"
HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTED IN A RATHER NICE MEDIUM BLUE GREY.
I BELIEVE THAT SOME MANAGER DECIDED THAT THEY WOULD CODE THAT THEY BELIEVE THAT I AM RIGHT AND THEY WANT TO PROTEST AT THE FACT THAT MY AWESOME PAPERS HAVE BEEN REJECTED. PERHAPS IT'S BECAUSE THERE IS AN ASTHMATIC OR DIABETIC IN THEIR FAMILY.
THE BAR GRAPHS IN BLUE TO THE RIGHT SIDE FOR EACH CATEGORY SHOW THAT MEN HAVE A HIGHER DEATH RATE FROM MELANOMA THAN WOMEN. IS THIS BECAUSE MEN TEND TO DRINK AND SMOKE MORE? ALCOHOL HAS BEEN REPORTED AS BEING ABLE TO LOWER THE BODY'S IMMUNE SYSTEM'S ABILITY TO FIGHT INFECTIONS AND CANCER.
WHITES HAVE A SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER DEATH RATE THAN ALL THE OTHER FOUR RACES WHICH SUGGESTS THAT THERE IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT ABOUT THE RACES. I HAVE ONLY HAD A BRIEF LOOK AT THE DIFFERENCES IN DIET BETWEEN A COUPLE OF THE RACES AND THINK THAT ASIANS MIGHT HAVE A LOWER RATE AS THEY TEND TO EAT MORE VEGETABLES AND LESS RED MEAT PERHAPS BECAUSE THEY ARE POORER, WHEREAS THE WESTERN DIET AT LEAST IN THE UK, MAY HAVE MORE MEAT, PIES, PASTRIES AND CAKES. VEGETABLES HAVE VITAMINS AND MINERALS THAT MEAT DOESN'T HAVE.
ALSO, ASIANS AND PACIFIC ISLANDERS LIKE ALASKAN NATIVES MIGHT CONSUME MORE FISH WHICH HAS OMEGA 3 AND IS AN ANTIOXIDANT WHICH IS SAID TO HELP REMOVE TOXINS FROM THE BODY AND NEUTRALISE FREE RADICALS, WHICH ARE CHEMICAL SPECIES THAT CAN HARM THE BODY.
Copyright © 2024 POISONOUS PRESCRIPTIONS - Do Antibiotics Cause Asthma & Diabetes? - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy